Publishing house

Pulse of the University, publishing news, rules of cooperation
and technical tips for authors can be found on the publisher's website.

Pulse of the University

The magazine was established in 2004. It publishes news about the University, texts prepared by students, interviews with students and graduates of our University, as well as information useful during studies. We encourage you to publish texts. If you are interested, please contact us at the following address wydawnictwo@pam.poznan.pl

Your Dynamic Snippet will be displayed here... This message is displayed because you did not provided both a filter and a template to use.

PAM Publishing Services

Redaction

editorial work, stylistic and technical correction of published publications

Graphic designs

preparation of graphic designs (e.g. covers, posters, invitations, business cards, Christmas cards)

Composition and printing

computer typesetting, printing of books, manuals, scripts

Publication

PAM is engaged in publishing scientific publications in the humanities, social sciences, medical sciences

With the commencement of activity in 20004 by the Higher School of Pedagogy and Administration Lives I in Poznań (currently the Prince Mieszko I Academy of Applied Sciences in Poznań - ANSM), the Scientific Publishing House was also established. It aims to publish the scientific and didactic achievements of ANSM researchers and other Polish and foreign scientists who express their willingness to cooperate. The publishing house is an administrative unit established to conduct editorial and printing activities, disseminate the research and scientific achievements of the university, and conduct promotion and distribution of university publications.

Wydawnictwo PAM w Poznaniu jest profesjonalnym, naukowym wydawnictwem akademickim, dbającym o poziom naukowy i edytorski wydawanych publikacji, działającym na rzecz upowszechniania wiedzy, budowy społeczeństwa wiedzy, współtworzenia środowiska naukowego, otwartego na świat i nowe wyzwania poznawcze. Wydawnictwo służy społeczności akademickiej PAM, popularyzuje jego osiągnięcia i dba o podnoszenie jego prestiżu w nauce polskiej i światowej.

Wydawnictwo znajduje się w wykazie wydawnictw publikujących recenzowane monografie naukowe (Komunikat Ministra Edukacji i Nauki z dnia 22 lipc 2021 r. ). PAM zajmuje się wydawaniem publikacji naukowych z zakresu nauk humanistycznych społecznych, w tym prawnych, pedagogicznych, psychologicznych, historycznych, bezpieczeństwie, nauk o zdrowiu i kulturze fizycznej, nauk medycznych. Wydawnictw publikuje i rozpowszechnia prace naukowe, podręczniki akademickie, skrypty, czasopisma, materiały konferencyjne informacyjne oraz inne wydawnictwa na potrzeby uczelni.

Nasze Wydawnictwo zaprasza do współpracy myślicieli, badaczy, naukowców – wszystkich tych, którzy swe przemyślenia, dociekania i analizy naukowe pieczołowicie spisują i pragną opublikować. Czekamy na młodych naukowców, którym trudniej wypromować się w wielkich, kosztownych i zbiurokratyzowanych, strukturach wydawniczych.

Wydawnictwo Naukowe bierze udział w sympozjach, zjazdach, konferencjach organizowanych przez naszą Uczelnię i inne uczelnie, prezentując swój dorobek edytorski.

O nowych publikacjach informujemy w „Pulsie Uczelni” (uczelnianym czasopiśmie) oraz na stronie internetowej Wydawnictwa PAM. Rozpowszechnianiu publikacji wydawnictwa służą też organizowane kiermasze książki akademickiej.

Do you want your text or work to be published in "Pulse of the University"? Write to us at: wydawnictwo@pam.poznan.pl, you can also fill in the
a notification of publication of scientific work.  

    Books published by ANSM

    Public Pricelist
    Sort by
    Henryk Semrau, Ploteczki i nieploteczki z czterech oflagów
    26.00 zł 26.00 zł 26.0 PLN
    Andrzej Nowakowski, Kontrola i nadzór spółdzielni przez jej członków oraz organy samorządowe
    26.00 zł 26.00 zł 26.0 PLN
    Kazimierz Denek, Nauczyciel. Między ideałem a codziennością
    34.70 zł 34.70 zł 34.7 PLN
    Die Mühen der Ebenen Aufsätze zur deutschen Literatur nach 1989
    60.00 zł 60.00 zł 60.0 PLN
    Jerzy Rotko, Ramowa dyrektywa wodna – analiza prawna
    36.75 zł 36.75 zł 36.75 PLN
    Controversial cults. Various approaches, ed. by Maciej Szostak
    49.00 zł 49.00 zł 49.0 PLN
    Katarzyna Gott, Maciej Szostak, Incest. Criminological studies
    45.00 zł 45.00 zł 45.0 PLN
    Joanna Kuriańska-Wołoszyn, Leonard Nowak, Gimnastyka w Polsce w latach 1919–1939
    41.00 zł 41.00 zł 41.0 PLN
    Zenon Kierczyński, Strategia zarządzania zmianą gospodarczą w regionie nowotomysko-grodziskim, red. Ewa Szuber-Bednarz
    25.00 zł 25.00 zł 25.0 PLN
    Andrzej Malinowski, Biomedyczne podstawy rozwoju. Repetytorium dla każdego
    0.00 zł 0.0 PLN
    Puls Uczelni 1 (27) 2015
    0.00 zł 0.0 PLN
    Puls Uczelni 2 (28) 2015
    0.00 zł 0.0 PLN
    Puls Uczelni 1 (29) 2016
    0.00 zł 0.0 PLN
    Puls Uczelni 1 (30) 2017
    0.00 zł 0.0 PLN
    pobierz Puls Uczelni 1 (31) 2018
    0.00 zł 0.0 PLN
    Puls Uczelni 2 (32) 2018
    0.00 zł 0.0 PLN
    Puls Uczelni 1 (33) 2019
    0.00 zł 0.0 PLN
    Puls Uczelni 1 (34) 2020
    0.00 zł 0.0 PLN
    Puls Uczelni 2 (35) 2020
    0.00 zł 0.0 PLN
    Puls Uczelni nr 1 (36) 2021
    0.00 zł 0.0 PLN

        Publisher's ethics

        The Publishing House of the Prince Mieszko I Poznan Academy of Medicine always applies the highest publication standards and is further guided by generally accepted principles of publishing ethics, aimed at firmly counteracting prohibited publication practices. In terms of publication ethics and scientific integrity, it follows the guidelines of the Comittee on Publication Ethics (COPE), and the review procedure is based on the indications of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education.

        The publications submitted to the publishing house will first be verified in terms of generally accepted principles of publishing ethics in accordance with the possessed knowledge using the available tools.

        The PUBLISHER's duties include:

          • compliance with generally applicable publishing standards and the principles of publishing ethics, and preventing practices inconsistent with the accepted standards,
          • objective and substantive evaluation of texts on the basis of opinions contained in scientific reviews. The main criteria for evaluating texts are their scientific value, originality of the approach to the topic and the clarity of the argument,
          • maintaining publishing secrecy, i.e. not disclosing information about the reported publications to unauthorized persons,
          • preventing conflicts of interest of authors, editors and translators.

        The duties of the SCIENTIFIC EDITOR include:

          • deciding which materials will be published. The basic criteria for accepting texts should be: the scientific value of the work, the originality of the approach to the topic and the clarity of the argument.
          • ensuring the scientific accuracy of the published works. In the case of suspicions of unfair practices (especially plagiarism, falsification of research results), the scientific editor should withdraw the text from the collective publication.
          • making sure that the co-authors of the collective work accept the corrections resulting from the scientific editorial.

        PUBLISHER and SCIENTIFIC EDITOR have the right to withdraw the publication after its publication, if:

          • there is evidence of unreliability of test results and / or falsification of data, as well as in case of unintentional errors (e.g. methodological errors, calculation errors);
          • the work is plagiarized or violates the principles of publishing ethics.

        The duties of the AUTHOR include:

          • ensuring the reliability and originality of the research results presented in the publication,
          • enabling the identification of sources cited in the research work,
          • granting access to the data presented in the work, even after the publication of the text,
          • obtaining the right to include in the publication all rights of third parties, including illustrations, tables, graphs, quotations, etc.
          • in the case of multi-author publications, disclosing the contribution of individual authors to their creation and preventing cases of scientific misconduct,
          • attaching a bibliography to the work, taking into account the publications that were used by him in the text,
          • immediate correction of all factual errors in the text, indicated by the editor at every stage of the publishing process or discovered by the author after the publication of the work.

        The duties of the REVIEWER include:

          • making sure that there is no conflict of interest between him and the AUTHOR of the reviewed publication.
          • timely execution of the commissioned review. The reviewer is obliged to immediately notify the publisher of any difficulties in meeting the deadline,
          • confidential. The reviewer may not disclose the reviewed works to persons who do not participate in the publishing process.
          • objective evaluation of the submitted work supported by appropriate argumentation.
          • immediate reporting to the PUBLISHER of the fragments of the text which there is a suspicion of scientific misconduct and an indication of the similarity to other works that may be subject to plagiarism.

        The TRANSLATOR'S duties include:

          • using the available knowledge and skills to ensure the highest quality of translation,
          • timely execution of the order. The translator is obliged to immediately notify the PUBLISHER of any difficulties in meeting the deadline,
          • in the case of translating another edition of a publication, ensuring that the existing translation is not plagiarized.
          • making sure that the translation does not infringe the rights of third parties to the materials contained in the text.

        The publishing house makes every effort to counteract unacceptable publishing practices, with particular emphasis on:

          • duplicate publication,
          • plagiarism,
          • fabrication of data,
          • ghost authorship
          • guest authorship.

        Publishing procedure

        Publishing House of the ANSM in Poznań always applies the highest publishing standards and is also guided by generally accepted principles of publishing ethics, aimed at resolutely counteracting prohibited publishing practices. In terms of publishing ethics and scientific integrity, it follows the guidelines of the Comittee on Publication Ethics (COPE), and the review procedure is based on the guidelines of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education.
        Authors interested in publishing a publication in the Scientific Publishers ANSM are asked to read the rules of cooperation between the Author and the Publishing House.
        Completely filled in, the application should be submitted to the Publishing House and sent in a Word document to the following address wydawnictwo@pam.poznan.pl

        Principles of Author's cooperation with the Publishing House and technical guidelines for authors intending to publish their works in PAM Scientific Publishing House

        I. General principles of cooperation with the author

        An essential step that must be taken by an Author interested in publishing his work is to submit it to the Publishing House or in the publishing application - it can be obtained at the seat of the Publishing House, on the Publisher's website or by e-mail. In the case of multi-author monographs, the person who should fill in such an application and contact the Publishing House in matters relating to the book is the Scientific Editor. The publication is included in the publishing plan after the approval of the publishing application by the University Authorities and after the Author (or Editor) has provided a complete set of materials (or the deadline for their submission has been specified by him). After the work on the book has begun, detailed issues concerning it will be discussed at individual meetings. The publications appearing in the publishing house are obligatorily subject to a scientific review. The waiting time for publication is approximately six months (it may change depending on the content of the publishing plan).

        II. What should be submitted to the Publishing House prior to the commencement of editorial work?

        The final and complete version of the work should be submitted in the form of:

        • two-sided computer print
        • and an electronic version compliant with the printout on an electronic carrier (labeled with the name, title and date, a CD or flash drive)
        • Layout of materials in the work submitted for publication:
          • title page (author, title, or scientific editor in a collective work or scientific journal)
          • editorial page (editorial committee of the journal)
          • table of contents (also including all supplementary materials, including abstract and indexes)
          • list of shortcuts
          • introduction / preface
          • the main text with footnotes (and illustrative materials, with the exact location in the text, if they have not been previously composed in the right places)
          • annex
          • footnotes and bibliography (bibliographic descriptions should be given in a uniform form and the selected writing method should be used consistently; see: the appendix with examples of footnotes and bibliography)
          • glossary of terms
          • indexes (if the Publisher has to prepare them, the Author will provide all necessary substantive assistance)
          • list of figures, tables, etc.
          • summary (in English and / or Polish)

        III. Technical guidelines for preparing materials for the Publisher

        1. Requirements for the electronic version of the text and computer printout:

          • the entire work in one file (the name of the file should include the author's / editor's name and the title of the work)
          • illustrative material (photos, charts, diagrams, tables) placed in appropriate places in the main text and additionally in separate files
          • all titles and headings in bold on separate lines
          • footnotes with hyper-indexed footnotes (entered automatically, using the appropriate Word function)
          • in the case of multi-author or collective works, all texts are unified into one version of Word
          • standardized and continuous page numbering; in collective works, it is allowed to make continuous numbering on the printout in handwriting text files in rtf or doc format (Word 2010 or higher, also special fonts)
          • 12-point Times New Roman font, 1.5 line spacing
          • margins of 2.5 cm
          • single or double-sided printing on A4 size paper

        2. Illustrative materials should be of good quality and standardized form and descriptions:

          • photos in separate files in JPG or TIFF format (with a resolution of at least 300 dpi) or in the form of originals of good quality, allowing for scans
          • charts prepared in Microsoft Word or Microsoft Excel (if they must undergo additional processing during editorial work)
          • vector drawings prepared and transferred in EPS or AI format
          • If, for financial reasons, the graphic material originally prepared in color (maps, charts, diagrams, etc.) is to be included in the work in black and white, it should be prepared by the author so that it is sufficiently legible in black and white print.

        The work submitted for publication after post-publication corrections should also contain an information note, which will be included in publishing announcements and on the website.

        IV. Meetings with the author while working on the book

        After the manuscript is approved for publication, the Author (or the scientific editor of the volume) will be asked to meet with the editors and to proofread the author.

        The author (or the scientific editor of the volume) will be asked to meet the editor who runs the book from the Publisher's website and to proofread the book. The number of meetings is determined individually, depending on the nature and volume of the publication as well as the diligence of its preparation by the author and compliance with the guidelines contained in this document.

        1. During meetings with the Author (or Editor), issues related to:

          • a schedule of publishing works,
          • adjustment and editing performed in the publishing house,
          • comments and suggestions from the reviewer,
          • the format, cover and graphic design of the book,
          • any deficiencies or inaccuracies,
          • publishing agreement and fee,
          • promotional copies and distribution

        2. Author's correction

        It is the responsibility of the author or editor of the book to make the author's corrections. It allows you to eliminate errors unnoticed before or arising during editorial work. At this stage, substantively justified minor additions or reductions in excerpts from the book are allowed, as long as these amendments do not violate the basic structure of the text. Making major changes generally affects the timing and cost of releasing the work. In the case of collective works, the editor of the volume is responsible for the author's correction (including the delivery of the texts to the Authors).

        The publishing house allows for the author's corrections to be made by the editor of the volume. If the Author does not meet the agreed deadline specified in the contract for the return of the correction, the Publishing House recognizes that he agrees to publish the work in the form submitted for correction without any corrections.

        After typesetting and proofreading, the Author (or Editor) receives proofs of the book and covers for approval. He should especially check the book layout, cover and editorial page. After the publication has been signed for printing and the author signs the title pages, the editorial page and the cover, no changes are possible anymore.

        V. General guidelines for the scientific editor of the collective work

        The publishing process of the volume begins with the delivery to Publishing House SET of materials with corrections applied after a positive review.

        Scientific editor:

        • prepares a detailed instruction for authors, which defines the layout of the article and its components
        • provides the Publisher with contracts with the Authors of individual texts in the publication
        • verifies the content of texts (including terminology, spelling of surnames, bibliography); articles should contain the same components with a homogeneous layout and nomenclature (especially bibliography, footnotes, annexes and summaries)
        • submits to the Publishing House a completed volume with the final table of contents and (if required by the series) foreign language abstracts or abstracts in English. English for each article; the whole in the form of a printout and the corresponding electronic version (+ special fonts used by the authors)
        • prepares information notes about the book and / or authors
        • during the publishing process, he cooperates with the editorial office of the Publishing House, acts as an intermediary between the authors of articles and the Editorial Board, resolves all doubts and answers questions related to the publication.

        The scientific editor is obliged to provide the authors with the texts for the author's proofreading.

        VI. Contact details

        Wydawnictwo Naukowe PAM 
        ul. Bułgarska 55, bud. C, pok. 8
        60-320 Poznań
        e-mail: wydawnictwo@pam.poznan.pl


         

        Review procedure

        Review procedure

        As a publisher of scientific publications, PAM conducts publishing activities in accordance with accepted publishing standards and applicable national and international regulations. PAM Scientific Publishing applies the ethical standards recommended by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education (MNiSW) and developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

        Monograph review procedure

        Selection and indicate of a reviewer

        1. A reviewer of the publication is an independent scientist appointed by the Publishing Council (habilitated doctor or titular professor) with recognized achievements in the field in which the book issues are included.
        2. The reviewer of the book is employed in a research center in Poland or abroad - other than the one represented by the author of the book, an exception may be the situation when the group of specialists in the field of the reviewed work is very narrow.
        3. In the case of works of an interdisciplinary nature, at least two reviewers are appointed.
        4. The author of the book has no influence on the selection and appointment of a reviewer.
        5. The reviewer and the author of the book cannot have close professional or personal relationships with each other - any so-called "Conflict of interest".
        6. The reviewer and the author cannot be co-authors of an earlier publication, or co-editors of the same collective work.
        7. In the case of habilitation monographs or professorial monographs, the reviewer cannot be the promoter of the author's doctoral dissertation.

        Download the review form (DOC 46,9 KB)Download the review form (DOC 46,9 KB)

        Recommendations to reviewers

        1. the reviewer, on the basis of the presented information about the author and the text, shall decide on the review of the monograph, taking into account his substantive competence and the deadline for preparing the review
        2) The appointed reviewer should notify the PAM Scientific Publishing House of any so-called "conflict of interest" and, in such a case, resign from performing the review
        3) The reviewer's recognition that the work does not meet the criteria of academic excellence and is not eligible for publication should not, in any case, result in resignation from performing the review - in such a case, the reviewer should prepare a well-reasoned review with a negative conclusion
        4. the review must be in writing and must not be only a description of the reviewed work, but its in-depth and well-grounded assessment with a clear conclusion
        5. in the case of advocating changes to the reviewed book, the reviewer may request to obtain a review of the revised version of the book in order to make a final decision on recommending it for publication and agreeing to have his or her name included in the book as a reviewer
        6. the reviewer is bound by the principle of confidentiality, he may not consult the content of his review or in any way disseminate its contents.

        Recommendations for the Author

        1. After the publishing house has appointed a reviewer, the author has no right to apply for its change
        2. The author has no right to apply for a change of the reviewer after receiving the text of the review
        3. The author must give his opinion on the content of the review in writing
        4. The author should correct the text in accordance with the reviewer's comments or explain in writing why he does not intend to take into account a given comment. The reviewer receives the content of the author's reply for review

        Review procedure in a scientific journal

        Stage 1
        After the article is received, its initial evaluation (by the thematic editor and / or the journal's chief editor) is carried out regarding the compliance of the article's content with the subject matter and compliance with the formal requirements (including volume, text editing, citations, quality of graphic elements, abstract). In the case of co-authoring publications, it is necessary to precisely define the participation of individual authors in the implementation of a given work and submit an appropriate declaration by them (on the contribution of the author / authors). The author / s is / are required to complete a declaration that the text submitted to a given journal has not been published in another publishing house. Relevant statements are available in the section: guidelines for authors - statements.
         
        A positive assessment in the first stage results in the submission of the article for the proper review.
         
        Stage 2
        For each publication, at least two reviewers are appointed, employed in leading universities in Poland and abroad, from outside the research unit affiliated by the author of the article. In justified cases, for authors from outside the College of Pedagogy and Administration, the reviewer may be a researcher at the College of Pedagogy and Administration. Reviews are carried out in the "double-blind review process" system (authors and reviewers do not know their identities). The reviewer should complete an appropriate declaration. Reviews are in writing and end with an unequivocal conclusion as to whether the article should be approved for publication (in its current form or after taking into account the comments of the reviewer) or its rejection. The review form is available on the website. The names of the reviewers of individual publications or journal issues are not disclosed. Once a year, the journal publishes a list of cooperating reviewers. The list of reviewers for the previous years is also posted on the journal's website.

        Stage 3
        The condition for publishing an article is two positive reviews. The review is considered negative, first of all, when the substantive level of the article is insufficient, the title of the study completely does not correspond to its content; the content of the study does not concern issues related to the subject of the scientific notebook and the selection of sources is not appropriate and up-to-date.

        In the event of receiving one positive and one negative review, the work is sent to a third reviewer whose opinion is binding

        Other general rules

        1. Reviews that do not meet the substantive and formal requirements of a scientific review are not accepted
        2. In the absence of a recommendation for publication - after the author introduces changes postulated by the reviewer, the thesis is returned to the reviewer in order to present his final opinion on the publication of the book
        3. The publishing house archives both the author's reviews and responses
        4. Reviews are prepared on the basis of appropriate formal agreements with reviewers.



        Review procedure

        As a publisher of scientific publications, PAM conducts publishing activities in accordance with accepted publishing standards and applicable national and international regulations. PAM Scientific Publishing applies the ethical standards recommended by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education (MNiSW) and developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

        Monograph review procedure

        Selection and indicate of a reviewer

        1. A reviewer of the publication is an independent scientist appointed by the Publishing Council (habilitated doctor or titular professor) with recognized achievements in the field in which the book issues are included.
        2. The reviewer of the book is employed in a research center in Poland or abroad - other than the one represented by the author of the book, an exception may be the situation when the group of specialists in the field of the reviewed work is very narrow.
        3. In the case of works of an interdisciplinary nature, at least two reviewers are appointed.
        4. The author of the book has no influence on the selection and appointment of a reviewer.
        5. The reviewer and the author of the book cannot have close professional or personal relationships with each other - any so-called "Conflict of interest".
        6. The reviewer and the author cannot be co-authors of an earlier publication, or co-editors of the same collective work.
        7. In the case of habilitation monographs or professorial monographs, the reviewer cannot be the promoter of the author's doctoral dissertation.

        Download the review form (DOC 46,9 KB)

        Recommendations to reviewers

        1. the reviewer, on the basis of the presented information about the author and the text, shall decide on the review of the monograph, taking into account his substantive competence and the deadline for preparing the review
        2) The appointed reviewer should notify the PAM Scientific Publishing House of any so-called "conflict of interest" and, in such a case, resign from performing the review
        3) The reviewer's recognition that the work does not meet the criteria of academic excellence and is not eligible for publication should not, in any case, result in resignation from performing the review - in such a case, the reviewer should prepare a well-reasoned review with a negative conclusion
        4. the review must be in writing and must not be only a description of the reviewed work, but its in-depth and well-grounded assessment with a clear conclusion
        5. in the case of advocating changes to the reviewed book, the reviewer may request to obtain a review of the revised version of the book in order to make a final decision on recommending it for publication and agreeing to have his or her name included in the book as a reviewer
        6. the reviewer is bound by the principle of confidentiality, he may not consult the content of his review or in any way disseminate its contents.

        Recommendations for the Author

        1. After the publishing house has appointed a reviewer, the author has no right to apply for its change
        2. The author has no right to apply for a change of the reviewer after receiving the text of the review
        3. The author must give his opinion on the content of the review in writing
        4. The author should correct the text in accordance with the reviewer's comments or explain in writing why he does not intend to take into account a given comment. The reviewer receives the content of the author's reply for review

        Review procedure in a scientific journal

        Stage 1
        After the article is received, its initial evaluation (by the thematic editor and / or the journal's chief editor) is carried out regarding the compliance of the article's content with the subject matter and compliance with the formal requirements (including volume, text editing, citations, quality of graphic elements, abstract). In the case of co-authoring publications, it is necessary to precisely define the participation of individual authors in the implementation of a given work and submit an appropriate declaration by them (on the contribution of the author / authors). The author / s is / are required to complete a declaration that the text submitted to a given journal has not been published in another publishing house. Relevant statements are available in the section: guidelines for authors - statements.
         
        A positive assessment in the first stage results in the submission of the article for the proper review.
         
        Stage 2
        For each publication, at least two reviewers are appointed, employed in leading universities in Poland and abroad, from outside the research unit affiliated by the author of the article. In justified cases, for authors from outside the College of Pedagogy and Administration, the reviewer may be a researcher at the College of Pedagogy and Administration. Reviews are carried out in the "double-blind review process" system (authors and reviewers do not know their identities). The reviewer should complete an appropriate declaration. Reviews are in writing and end with an unequivocal conclusion as to whether the article should be approved for publication (in its current form or after taking into account the comments of the reviewer) or its rejection. The review form is available on the website. The names of the reviewers of individual publications or journal issues are not disclosed. Once a year, the journal publishes a list of cooperating reviewers. The list of reviewers for the previous years is also posted on the journal's website.

        Stage 3
        The condition for publishing an article is two positive reviews. The review is considered negative, first of all, when the substantive level of the article is insufficient, the title of the study completely does not correspond to its content; the content of the study does not concern issues related to the subject of the scientific notebook and the selection of sources is not appropriate and up-to-date.

        In the event of receiving one positive and one negative review, the work is sent to a third reviewer whose opinion is binding

        Other general rules

        1. Reviews that do not meet the substantive and formal requirements of a scientific review are not accepted
        2. In the absence of a recommendation for publication - after the author introduces changes postulated by the reviewer, the thesis is returned to the reviewer in order to present his final opinion on the publication of the book
        3. The publishing house archives both the author's reviews and responses
        4. Reviews are prepared on the basis of appropriate formal agreements with reviewers.



        Review procedure

        As a publisher of scientific publications, PAM conducts publishing activities in accordance with accepted publishing standards and applicable national and international regulations. PAM Scientific Publishing applies the ethical standards recommended by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education (MNiSW) and developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

        Monograph review procedure

        Selection and indicate of a reviewer

        1. A reviewer of the publication is an independent scientist appointed by the Publishing Council (habilitated doctor or titular professor) with recognized achievements in the field in which the book issues are included.
        2. The reviewer of the book is employed in a research center in Poland or abroad - other than the one represented by the author of the book, an exception may be the situation when the group of specialists in the field of the reviewed work is very narrow.
        3. In the case of works of an interdisciplinary nature, at least two reviewers are appointed.
        4. The author of the book has no influence on the selection and appointment of a reviewer.
        5. The reviewer and the author of the book cannot have close professional or personal relationships with each other - any so-called "Conflict of interest".
        6. The reviewer and the author cannot be co-authors of an earlier publication, or co-editors of the same collective work.
        7. In the case of habilitation monographs or professorial monographs, the reviewer cannot be the promoter of the author's doctoral dissertation.

        Download the review form (DOC 46,9 KB)

        Recommendations to reviewers

        1. the reviewer, on the basis of the presented information about the author and the text, shall decide on the review of the monograph, taking into account his substantive competence and the deadline for preparing the review
        2) The appointed reviewer should notify the PAM Scientific Publishing House of any so-called "conflict of interest" and, in such a case, resign from performing the review
        3) The reviewer's recognition that the work does not meet the criteria of academic excellence and is not eligible for publication should not, in any case, result in resignation from performing the review - in such a case, the reviewer should prepare a well-reasoned review with a negative conclusion
        4. the review must be in writing and must not be only a description of the reviewed work, but its in-depth and well-grounded assessment with a clear conclusion
        5. in the case of advocating changes to the reviewed book, the reviewer may request to obtain a review of the revised version of the book in order to make a final decision on recommending it for publication and agreeing to have his or her name included in the book as a reviewer
        6. the reviewer is bound by the principle of confidentiality, he may not consult the content of his review or in any way disseminate its contents.

        Recommendations for the Author

        1. After the publishing house has appointed a reviewer, the author has no right to apply for its change
        2. The author has no right to apply for a change of the reviewer after receiving the text of the review
        3. The author must give his opinion on the content of the review in writing
        4. The author should correct the text in accordance with the reviewer's comments or explain in writing why he does not intend to take into account a given comment. The reviewer receives the content of the author's reply for review

        Review procedure in a scientific journal

        Stage 1
        After the article is received, its initial evaluation (by the thematic editor and / or the journal's chief editor) is carried out regarding the compliance of the article's content with the subject matter and compliance with the formal requirements (including volume, text editing, citations, quality of graphic elements, abstract). In the case of co-authoring publications, it is necessary to precisely define the participation of individual authors in the implementation of a given work and submit an appropriate declaration by them (on the contribution of the author / authors). The author / s is / are required to complete a declaration that the text submitted to a given journal has not been published in another publishing house. Relevant statements are available in the section: guidelines for authors - statements.
         
        A positive assessment in the first stage results in the submission of the article for the proper review.
         
        Stage 2
        For each publication, at least two reviewers are appointed, employed in leading universities in Poland and abroad, from outside the research unit affiliated by the author of the article. In justified cases, for authors from outside the College of Pedagogy and Administration, the reviewer may be a researcher at the College of Pedagogy and Administration. Reviews are carried out in the "double-blind review process" system (authors and reviewers do not know their identities). The reviewer should complete an appropriate declaration. Reviews are in writing and end with an unequivocal conclusion as to whether the article should be approved for publication (in its current form or after taking into account the comments of the reviewer) or its rejection. The review form is available on the website. The names of the reviewers of individual publications or journal issues are not disclosed. Once a year, the journal publishes a list of cooperating reviewers. The list of reviewers for the previous years is also posted on the journal's website.

        Stage 3
        The condition for publishing an article is two positive reviews. The review is considered negative, first of all, when the substantive level of the article is insufficient, the title of the study completely does not correspond to its content; the content of the study does not concern issues related to the subject of the scientific notebook and the selection of sources is not appropriate and up-to-date.

        In the event of receiving one positive and one negative review, the work is sent to a third reviewer whose opinion is binding

        Other general rules

        1. Reviews that do not meet the substantive and formal requirements of a scientific review are not accepted
        2. In the absence of a recommendation for publication - after the author introduces changes postulated by the reviewer, the thesis is returned to the reviewer in order to present his final opinion on the publication of the book
        3. The publishing house archives both the author's reviews and responses
        4. Reviews are prepared on the basis of appropriate formal agreements with reviewers.



        Information for authors

        Principles of cooperation

        ANSM Publishing House was established in order to publish the scientific achievements of the University's employees and the scripts necessary for its students. ANSM lecturers' books have priority in print. It is also possible to publish (under special conditions) scientific studies of authors not related to ANSM, as long as the titles proposed by them correspond to the profile of the School or the needs of its students.

        • The publication is included in the publishing plan after approval by the Publishing Council and approval by the University Authorities and the Author (or Editor) providing a complete set of materials (or setting the deadline for their submission). After the work on the book has begun, detailed issues concerning it will be discussed at individual meetings.
        • The publications appearing in the publishing house are obligatorily subject to a scientific review.
        • The waiting time for publication is approximately six months (it may change depending on the content of the publishing plan). Scripts for classes that are to start from the new academic year should be submitted to the publishing plan and submitted to the publishing house in advance.

        Technical guidelines for preparing materials for the Publisher:

        General Guidelines (PDF 452 KB) Publishing application form (PDF 452 KB) Publishing application form (doc 452 KB)

        Scientific Articles by Students.

        Dear Students,

        We encourage you to publish scientific texts in the scientific publishing house of the Prince Mieszko I Poznan Medical Academy in Poznan. This is an excellent opportunity for scientific development, but also to expand your knowledge in the research area that interests you.

        If you are interested, please complete the application, send it by e-mail or deliver it in person to the publisher.

        Anti-plagiarism system

        PAM Publishing House is committed to ensuring the scientific integrity of published works and makes every effort to counter unacceptable publication practices, with particular attention to duplicate publication and plagiarism.

        Each author submits a Declaration of the originality of the submitted work.

        In case of suspicion of unfair practices, the reviewer, scientific editor and members of the Scientific Council request the withdrawal of the text.

        ANSM in Poznań uses the Uniform Anti-plagiarism System 
        https://jsa.opi.org.pl/  and Plagiat.pl


        Publications published at the Prince Mieszko I Poznan Medical Academy can be purchased in person at the PAM Library (Świerzawska Street 18, room 024) or by correspondence by sending an order to the following address biblioteka@pam.poznan.pl or wydawnictwo@pam.poznan.pl.

        The library is open during the hours:

        Monday closed

        Tuesday 8:00 am to 3:00 pm

        Wednesday 8:00 to 15:00

        Thursday closed

        Friday 8:00 am to 3:00 pm

        Saturday 8:00 am to 3:00 pm

        Sunday 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.


        Purchase conditions

        The publications of ANSM Scientific Publishing House can be purchased by placing an order by e-mail or by phone, as well as purchased at selected points of sale.

        Terms of orders:

        • We accept orders by phone, letter or e-mail
        • postage costs are added to the order according to the price list of the Polish Post, increased by 23% VAT
        • books are sent to individual recipients with cash on delivery (cash on delivery) or against prepayment to the account number provided on the invoice
        • Institutional recipients make payments by bank transfer on the basis of the invoice received with the book
        • we issue VAT invoices

        When ordering a book, please provide:

        • information about the book (author, title, number of copies)
        • name and surname of the ordering person
        • accurate contact details

        Selling Points:
        Library of ANSM, ul. Bułgarska 55, bud. C
        Księgarnia Uniwersytecka WNS, ul. Szamarzewskiego 89

        Bank account:
        Account owner name:
        Akademia Nauk Stosowanych im. Księcia Mieszka I w Poznaniu
        ul. Bułgarska 55        ; 60-320 Poznań

        Bank: 
        BZ WBK Poznań Odział III
        Nr konta:36 1090 1359 0000 0001 0273 9210

        ANSM Editorial Board

        PAM publishing board

        dr inż. Włodzimierz Usarek, prof. PAM (przewodniczący)
        dr Andrzej Bolewski, prof. PAM
        prof. dr hab. Bolesław Andrzejewski
        prof. dr hab. Zdzisław Gregorek
        dr Anna Zbaraszewska
        prof. dr hab. Idzi Siatkowski
        dr Andriy Malovychko
        dr Joanna Łupicka
        dr Anna Gapińska
        dr Andrzej Nowakowski
        dr Remigiusz Tritt
        dr Bernard Kimel
        dr Jacek Biernacki
        mgr Krzysztof Kostewicz
        dr Aleksandra Załustowicz
        dr Paulina Wiśniewska
        dr Lidia Huber
        dr Artur Salomon
        dr Bogusław Bałuka

        Contact

         61 646 02 32

         wydawnictwo@pam.poznan.pl

         ul. Bułgarska 55, pokój 115

         Hours of operation:

        Tuesday - Thursday 8:00 am - 1:00 pm